Tuesday, August 29, 2017

Your Guide to That Trump Supporter You Know

I think that all of us now know somebody that supports Donald Trump who we consider too intelligent for such nonsense. Well, friends, stop right there and listen up! Just because your friend/family member/co-worker is a Trumpian doesn't mean that he or she is an idiot or a racist. Read on to learn from your personal guru, Jay!

The first thing you need to know is that the more you insult them, call them racist or call them stupid the more they will stick with Trump. Like glue. Yes, it's stubborn, yes it's to spite you.

The second thing you need to know is that not everyone who voted for Trump is sticking with him. His numbers are the worst of any President at this point in their first term and the only thing less popular is Congress.

The third thing you need to know is that Trumpians are loving how angry Trump makes you. It's trolling and it's just a wind-up, but they love it. The more shocked and angry you get, the more they love Trump.

The fourth and final thing you need to know about Trump supporters is that they don't care how hypocritical it makes them look. They don't care that they may be an evangelical on one hand and support a guy who bragged about grabbing them by the pussy. They don't care that if a Democrat said 1/10th of the things Trump does they would despise him. They don't care that it doesn't jive to talk about law and order and then encourage cops to police brutality. They don't care that they talk of making America Great again and they support a guy who gave top secret intel to Russia right in the Oval Office! They don't care.

So why do your Trumpian friends behave this way?

There are a few factors at play here. We all need to get over the idea that Trump supporters are all racists. They aren't. They may well come to be embarrassed in the extreme when all is said and done and history is written, but their support of Trump is, in most cases driven by feelings of alienation and not belonging. To them it's what Trump represents that matters. To you Trump represents egotism, racism and authoritarianism. To them Trump represents border security, fair trade deals, military strength, victory against terrorism, and an end to excessive political correctness. None of that may be reality, but these people feel like Trump speaks for them. They're sick and tired of oppressive political correctness. They sick of ceding ground on foreign policy. They're shocked by the inability of politicians to even mention the term "radical islamic terrorism". And they're angry over being told that they are racist or stupid because they don't live in New York or L.A. Trump is a disgusting person whose solutions don't make sense and who plays on the worst fears and instincts of people. And yes, Trumpians should be ashamed of what they're enabling and turning a blind eye to. Chances are many will, in the future, be ashamed of their support of Trump. But right now, in the moment, they feel justified and entitled to give that support because they feel insulted, disparaged and marginalized.

In some ways Trump is the inevitable backlash (no, not whitelash) against the lows and excesses of modern liberalism. Take a look at the modern college campus for all the fuel you need to drive people into the arms of a Trump. Try telling an unemployed coal miner from Pennsylvania that he has to check his white, male privilege. Intersectional theory represents the worst that the left offers in western society. It is at its core a conspiracy theory and it separates people rather than unites them. It's created the oppression olympics and has given people on the left the feeling that they have free license to stifle free speech and engage in violent protests. Telling people that their views don't matter because their experience isn't the same as yours is rubbish. Saying everyone with the same skin color or gender has the same experience is ignorant and being a leftist doesn't give you a pass on that. The more it happens, the more Trumpians stick with Trump.

We should not forget the failings of past Presidents, Republican and Democrat. The North Korea problem is one that past administrations dithered over. ISIL wouldn't exist without the Iraq invasion. And Obama's red lines meant nothing and that made America look weak. It emboldened Russia, who Obama did very little about. Trump supporters see him as tough on all of these issues, even if he's really just reckless. The more you say he's an idiot, the more the Trumpians stick with Trump.

Trump, without a doubt, plays the racist card. His reaction to Charlottesville shows that quite clearly. Equating Nazis with those who protest Nazis is pandering to white supremacists, pure and simple. There is no moral equivalency there. But take a look at what just happened at Berkeley. Not bothering to be honest about the actions of antifa drives Trumpians closer to Trump. When Black Lives Matter says that cops aren't welcome at a pride parade, Trumpians stick with trump. When pride organizers say Jews aren't welcome, Trumpians stick with Trump. When the right behaves in a racist way people rightly condemn them. When the left behaves racist and the media doesn't cover it, Trumpians stick with Trump.

Pardoning Sheriff Arpaio was a disgusting act of pure cynical theatre. The man was convicted of abuse of power. He illegally targeted immigrants. He conducted illegal investigations against his opponents. He refused to investigate sexual assaults. He was, in every way a racist vigilante and the facts of the matter are so clear that there is no excuse for pardoning him. But when Trump's supporters want border security it doesn't make them racist. It's not racist to believe that illegal immigrants are first and foremost illegal. It's not racist to believe that people should come into your country legally or be thrown out. It may not be a practical policy considering how many illegals are in the US, but it's not racist. But the more you call Trumpians racist the more they stick with Trump.

I could go on and on, but I'll leave you with this final thought: they're going to lose, big. I don't just mean elections. Do you believe that those Bernie Sanders supporters that gave Trump the election by taking their bat and ball and going home will stay home again? They won't. The numbers just aren't there for Trump or the GOP in Congress. Congress may well throw themselves a life preserver by impeaching Trump, but right now they are unpopular because they haven't done anything, about Trump or anything else.

History is not going to be kind to Trump or his supporters. This is a man who bragged about sexual assault, made fun of a disabled reporter, and disparaged the electoral college on Twitter until the electoral college suited him. He has called the free press the enemy. He has threatened to jail his opponent. The FBI investigates him so he fires the head of the FBI. A special prosecutor is investigating him and his campaign for collusion with the Russians and he has publicly mused about firing him too! If there's nothing to find then why would he even consider it?

Your Trump supporter friends, family and co-workers are very soon to be the most ashamed and embarrassed people of the last 50 years. But not understanding why they stick with him is half of the problem with the left.

But that's just the way I see it.

Monday, July 10, 2017

Alberta's Fiscal Reckoning Will Come....Soon

Those of you who read the drivel I write on this site will know that it has been about 8 months since I've written anything. Well, sometimes you need a break to recharge and rebuild your arsenal of topics to write about. So, I'm back and today I'd like to delight you with some facts about how shitty Alberta's financial position is, and why you can expect it to get worse before it gets better.

This morning Alberta had it's credit rating downgraded (again) to double "A" by DBRS. Not only was the running of continuous deficits cited as a reason, but so was the complete lack of a plan to return Alberta's budget to balance. So let's look at where we are here in God's country:

In the last budget tabled by Alberta's NDP government they forecasted a $10 Billion deficit. That's just in their operations. The capital borrowing is on top of that (a sad practise held over from the Redford Tories). It gets better, though. That budget forecasted that oil would average $55/barrel throughout the fiscal year. Oil has yet to rise to $55 in the first 4 months of the fiscal year. The highest it has been is $53 and that was only for a week. Oil has spent most of this fiscal year well under $50 a barrel. For every dollar that oil averages below the government's forecast the government loses $310 million in revenue.

The NDP's forecast for oil for the next two years is $59 and $68. This is pure fantasy. Nothing in the market should lead anyone to believe that oil will rise to those levels during the next two years. There is a severe excess of supply in the market and more supply is coming on line all the time. Furthermore, there are wells in the US that aren't online and are expected to be in the next two years. No, my friends, oil is going to cheap for a long time.

That $10 Billion deficit starts to look a lot more like a $14 Billion deficit when reality sets in. Additionally, in the next two years the NDP believes that its deficits will be $9.7 Billion and $7.2 Billion respectively. That's with the expectation of rising oil prices. The NDP also plans to spend about $25 Billion on capital over the next 3 years, much of which is not included in their operational expense. $16 Billion will be borrowed.

The accumulated debt is forecast to hot $45 Billion at the end of this fiscal year. This becomes worse if they miss their revenue targets, which is a certainty. The NDP forecasts that the debt will rise to over $71 Billion by 2019-20...again, if they hit their targets (they won't).

As interest rates rise Alberta's debt servicing costs will also rise. They have budgeted for $1.7 Billion this year alone. It doesn't get better in the future.

Perhaps they believe that Alberta's economy will just grow them out of it. Again, this is fantasy. Their own economic outlook forecasts real GDP growth of 2.6% this year and 2.2% next year. Not exactly robust. Perhaps the long awaited economic diversification will finally come to Alberta. Maybe investors and businesspeople will look past the increases in taxes that have hit Alberta under the NDP. Maybe they'll choose Alberta over the about to be lower taxed US out of the goodness of their hearts.

Yet the spending announcements just keep on rolling along. But at some point the rubber hits the road, so to speak. The cuts will come. Either the NDP will do it or they will lose the election in 2019 and their successors will.

Work in education, post-secondary, health or in the public service? Brace for impact.

But that's just the way I see it.

Monday, December 19, 2016

Why I'm Leaving Facebook

Over the past 18 months my facebook friends list has shrunk from 150 to about 90. That doesn't mean that I dislike these people. I just wasn't communicating with them.

Some have 700....or 1000 friends....like they are engaging with all of them.

Communication.....they key here....

I want to communicate with people I like and give a damn about. I am no longer convinced that facebook is the medium I wish to communicate with people I give a damn about. It certainly isn't for those I don't give a shit about.

Facebook is a weak medium for communication. So is Twitter, for that matter. But Twitter I can read without having to engage. Facebook requires me to be "friends" with you. What I post you see and what you post I see, unless we don't follow each other, in which case it means you may as well be on Twitter.

Well, I like all of you. But I don't particularly have an interest in what everyone posts. And if the penalty for connection is to see constant memes and phony emotional suggestions, I surrender.

I want to get back to REAL communication. The now lost art of conversation. I want to go out and have drinks with you and talk about interesting things. I want to hear about things in detail. I want know if you liked that film, or what you thought of the local council's zoning decision...with FEEDBACK!  I want to disagree! Good GOD! How has that been lost? How is it that people are offended by anything they don't agree with and have to lash out, or even worse feign PSTD and require a safe space???

Facebook has made us weaker, stupider and less interesting. We think that if we post it, they will come. While that worked for Obama in '08, there was more at play there. We need to converse. In person. Otherwise you get idiocy. We get lost in our own views and can't handle others.

Call me for a drink. You know how to get a hold of me.

With Love,


But that's just the way I see it.

Tuesday, December 13, 2016

The Worst Modern Christmas Trends

As those of you who read the crap I write in this space know, I love Christmas. I'm not a religious man at all, but I still love the whole Christmas season. Santa, Rudolph, Jingle Bells and all of that. I'm even okay with the religious aspects of Christmas. I don't get offended by Greek mythology, so why would I get offended by baby Jesus? So, in short, I love Christmas because of the messages of peace, hope, and treating others with kindness. I also love that businesses make huge dollars at Christmas off of people buying presents not for themselves, but for others. Sadly, there are some things about Christmas that have emerged in recent years that I dislike. In case you care, here they are, not in any order.

Pop Singers Doing Duets With Dead People

If Elvis wanted to do a duet with you he wouldn't have died. Take the hint. Singing alongside a disembodied voice belonging to a star long since dead is creepy.

Christmas Cards That Don't Open

I love getting Christmas cards. My lovely wife and I usually display them on our dining room table. When you get a bunch of them it looks very pretty. Sadly, some folks don't send cards anymore. I mean, I love to get photos of people, and some of them (not all) may even make it on to my refrigerator. But put the photo inside a card that opens! If the card doesn't open, how am I supposed to display it? A Christmas card should open. FACT!

Being Too Scared To Say The Word "Christmas"

This just pisses me off. As I stated, I'm not a religious person, yet who in the word is offended by Christmas? Nobody I care to associate with. People so PC that they can't understand that there are elements to western and North American culture that are okay to be proud of are either just pandering or confused. I'm not okay with saying that our culture needs to be eliminated because it's not a match to cultures that people who immigrate here are used to. There's tolerance and inclusion, and then there's idiocy and self-loathing. Yes, there are other holidays during this season, but if you think we'd make a whole holiday season out of it without Christmas, you're fooling yourself.

Being Too Scared To Have A Christmas Party

This is so ridiculous. Having a "Holiday Party" or having a "Staff Appreciation Party" in the new year? Stop hating your own country's heritage. Immigrants know that there's a history and culture here. Atheists know that Christmas is, by and large, a secular holiday these days. Why is it that everyone I ever see who is offended by Christmas isn't a new Canadian, a Muslim or a Hindu? It's always some PC socks and sandals wearing liberal who feels obligated to feel offended on behalf of someone else!

Not Putting Up Christmas Lights

Bet these are the same folks that take their kids to the shopping mall or the leisure centre for Halloween instead of letting be kids and trick or treat. Get in the spirit of the season you Grinches!

Merry Christmas everyone!

But that's just the way I see it.

Tuesday, July 23, 2013

Do You Live In A Murder Capital?

I often get discouraged by reading or watching the news. One might think that I live in a fairly violent place. But when I look around at comparisons across the continent, I realize that it's not too bad in Oil Country.

In 2011 the murder capital of Canada was Winnipeg, followed by Halifax and Edmonton. But even Winnipeg isn't so bad in comparison to some other cities in North America. Let's late a look, shall we? Yes, we shall.

Canada (2011) Rates per 100,000 per year (Major Cities)

Winnipeg 5.08
Halifax 4.41
Edmonton 4.17 (2.72 in 2010, 2.8 in 2012)
Regina 3.15
Saskatoon 2.16
St. John's 2.12
Vancouver 1.77
Toronto 1.49
Montreal 1.38
Ottawa 1.16
Calgary 1.10
Canada 1.73

Now let's compare to the rest of North America

Here's Central America (per 100,000, 2011):

San Pedro Sula, Hon 158.87 (that's not a typo! #1 in the world!)
Juarez, Mex 147.77
Acapulco, Mex 127.92
Tegucigalpa, Hon 99.69
Torreon, Mex 87.75
Chihuahua, Mex 82.96
Durango, Mex 79.88
Guatemala City, Gua 74.58
Mazatlan, Mex 68.94
Tepic, Mex 68.05
Veracruz, Mex 59.94
San Salvador, El Sal 58.63

How about the good old USofA? Per 100,000, 2011

New Orleans 57.6
Detroit 48.2
St. Louis 35.3
Newark 33.8
Baltimore 31.3
Oakland 26.3
Kansas City 23.4
Philadelphia 21.2
Atlanta 20.7
Cincinnati 20.5
Stockton 19.7
Cleveland 18.6
Memphis 17.9
Washington DC 17.5
Miami 16.8
Chicago 15.9
Pittsburgh 14.3

There are 27 metro areas in the USA that have a homicide rate of more than 10.0 per 100,000 per year.

What about some of the other notable cities?

New York 6.3
Los Angeles 7.7
Las Vegas 5.6
Dallas 10.9
Houston 9.2
Denver 5.6
San Francisco 6.1
Anaheim 4.4
Raleigh 4.2
Jacksonville 8.5
Boston 10.1
Buffalo 13.7
Indianapolis 11.5
Milwaukee 13.5
Omaha 10.4
Tampa 8.2
Nashville 8.2

So where would you want to live to avoid murders?

Seattle 3.2
San Diego 2.9
Portland, Ore 3.4

USA avg. 4.7

So there you have it. It may be cold as hell in Winnipeg and Edmonton, but when we think we have a bad year, we're still lucky.

But that's just the way I see it.

Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Rating All The James Bond Films ***UPDATED***

Those of you who read this blog know that occasionally I am prone to posting complete and utter nonsense. Well, let's continue that trend. So here I go. Let's rate all of the "official" James Bond films. I am a huge fan of 007, but have to admit that after going through all of the James Bond films that most of them are crap. I have read most of Ian Fleming's James Bond novels as well, and my ideal of James Bond is based on the books. In my view, very few of the films got it right, even if they were somewhat entertaining. So let's get on with this purely subjective drivel....

Dr. No (1962) 8/10
The first James Bond film, Dr. No is an excellent spy thriller. It follows the book fairly well, too. Connery is excellent as Bond, and the film doesn't get too ridiculous. A great villain and a delicious Bond girl set the formula for the franchise.

From Russia With Love (1963) 10/10
In my view, From Russia With Love is the best James Bond film of them all. The film follows the book fairly well, and the casting is amazing. Robert Shaw plays a fantastic villain, and Connery is again spot on. I love this film because it is a real espionage tale involving the theft of a decoding machine. There is no silly world-might-blow-up nonsense. Bond fans are introduced to SPECTRE in this film as well, with a great villain in Rosa Klebb.

Goldfinger (1964) 8/10
Considered by many to be the definitive James Bond film, Goldfinger is a seriously entertaining film. Goldfinger is a wonderful villain, and Bond's progression through the story is perfectly paced. The script and Connery's performance are exceptional. Though plot is really secondary to style, the film pulls it off.

Thunderball (1965) 7/10
The last of the James Bond films to not have a silly plot full of cute gadgets and ridiculous consequences, Thunderball features great locales and atmosphere. SPECTRE's ransom of nuclear weapons starts the trend of Bond movies having bond save the world. Largo is a ruthless and evil villain, as well.

You Only Live Twice (1967) 6/10
This is where James Bond started to go off the rails. Hollowed out volcanoes and Donald Pleasnace's performance as Blofleld were to be the stuff of parody 30 years later. Mini helicopters with machine guns began the gadget-heavy cartoonish James Bond that would be the standard for 30 years. Connery's lack of enthusiasm is obvious and it is no surprise that he quit the role after this film. Still, there are some entertaining parts to this film that can't be ignored.

On Her Majesty's Secret Service (1969) 7/10
In 1969 the #1 male model in Europe was George Lazenby. As the new James Bond, Lazenby wasn't immediately accepted and his acting ability was questioned. His announcement that he would not play James Bond again prior to the premier ensured that his one outing as James Bond wasn't as successful as it could have been. As a film, On Her Majesty's Secret Service is rather good. Telly Savalas as the villain Blofeld and Diana Rigg as the Bond girl were above average casting decisions for James Bond films. The story follows the book almost exactly. It's shock ending wasn't changed for Hollywood, making this a classic Bond film.

Diamonds Are Forever (1971) 4/10
Sean Connery's return as James Bond in 1971 wasn't a great decision. At this time Connery already looked too old for the part, and the story was ludicrous. Bathed in early 70's kitsch, Diamonds Are Forever is one of the worst James Bond films.

Live and Let Die (1973) 7/10
After playing Simon Templar, Roger Moore was a natural choice to play James Bond. His first Bond film is arguably his best. A decent story with great performances all around set this apart from many Bond films. The fact that this is one of the few Bond films where the consequences of Bond failing isn't the end of the world is a huge plus.

The Man With The Golden Gun (1974) 6/10
Moore's second Bond film was second rate compared to his first. The casting was good, but the story was dull. The film's ending was typical 70's Bond fare: blow it all up. Boring.

The Spy Who Loved Me (1977) 5/10
If you like lots of gadgets and underwater cars then this is the Bond film for you. Bond in bell bottom slacks never did work for me, and the ridiculous story couldn't be saved by Curt Jurgens' excellent performance as the villain.

Moonraker (1979) 4/10
The first half of Moonraker is excellent. Espionage, intrigue and action are the order of the day. The second half of Moonraker is just awful. Bond flying a space shuttle? Space battles? Terrible.

For Your Eyes Only (1981) 7/10
After the horrid Moonraker, For Your Eyes Only was a deal breaker for the Bond franchise. Good thing that it's a rather decent film. The only thing I really hated about this movie was the terrible score. But this Bond film does away with end-of-the-world scenarios and silly gadgets in favour of a straight ahead spy story. That change was welcome. Moore's portrayal of a more cold Bond was excellent.

Octopussy (1983) 5/10
1983 saw a return to the silly side of James Bond with Octopussy. Lots of gadgets and another world-will-end plot added up to a bad Bond film. There are some good action sequences, but it's just too much comedy for me.

A View To A Kill (1985) 6/10
Roger Moore's last Bond film has the best Bond villain of all time: Christopher Walken as Max Zorin. Parts of this movie are silly, but it does have some very good sequences as well. Moore clearly looks too old for the part here, but this isn't a bad James Bond film. It's just not great either.

The Living Daylights (1987) 6/10
Timothy Dalton proved that being a great actor doesn't mean that you'll be a great James Bond. Writing matters to movies and Dalton was let down badly in this film. Some of the dialogue is cringe inducing. A shame, since the story is a return to a more book-like James Bond. This film starts out strong but fades towards the end. I have to say that I like Dalton, but this isn't classic Bond.

License to Kill (1989) 5/10
Dalton's second and last James Bond film is a violent and gritty action film. Not much espionage going on here. An atypical James Bond film. Dalton deserved better.

Goldeneye (1995) 6/10
The guy who would have been James Bond in the 80's were it not for contractual obligations was now in the role many believed he was born for. But be careful what you wish for. In my view, Pierce Brosnan is an excellent actor, but was not an excellent James Bond. Something about his portrayal of Bond always rubbed me the wrong way and didn't ring true. Goldeneye as a film isn't too bad, though. Sean Bean makes a great villain, but the story just isn't that good. Goldeneye did feature Judi Dench as "M" for the first time.

Tomorrow Never Dies (1997) 7/10
Brosnan's most entertaining Bond film features Jonathan Pryce as the fantastic Bond villain. This Bond outing has some great action sequences, entertaining dialogue and a fun story. It's a bit ridiculous, but is put together well enough to recommend.

The World Is Not Enough (1999) 3/10
Beating out the awful Moonraker is a tough job, but The World is Not Enough manages to do it. Easily the worst Bond film, this total piece of garbage has terrible writing, a dumb story and a boring plot. Skip it.

Die Another Day (2002) 4/10
Pierce Brosnan's final Bond film featured some great casting including John Cleese and Hally Berry. But it is so cartoonish that it is impossible to like. Invisible cars and ice hotels. 'Nuff said. Like Timothy Dalton, Pierce Brosnan deserved better, and so did James Bond fans.

Casino Royale (2006) 8/10
The long awaited re-boot of the James Bond franchise brought Bond back to the first Bond novel, Casino Royale. Cast as James Bond, Daniel Craig was a surprising choice for many. But on screen Craig proves to be the best Bond since Sean Connery's early Bond portrayals. The film could have used a tighter script and it goes on a little too long. Still, it is always entertaining. An excellent cast and Craig's performance make this one of the best James Bond films.

Quantum of Solace (2008) 7/10
The sequel to Casino Royale wasn't as well received, although I quite frankly liked it. Craig continues his excellent portrayal of Bond. The story isn't as good as Casino Royale, but there are some exceptional sequences in this film, including a shootout at an opera where the sounds of gunfire are omitted in favour of the operatic score. Excellent. Violent and complex, I really think that this one is under-rated.

Skyfall (2012) 6/10
Critics have said that Skyfall is perhaps the best Bond film in the series. I disagree. It is an okay film,  but it isn't the best in the series. Skyfall follows the recent trend in action movies of being gritty, violent and dark. It feels more like a Nolan Batman movie than a Bond movie. That said, Javier Bardem is a great villain, and worth the price of admission alone. Craig is a great action star as well, but Judi Dench's prominent role in the film exposes the bad writing for her character. Does she need to say "bloody" in every sentence? This film lacks much of the wit that made Bond great in the first place, but is a fine action film on its own. There just isn't any spying by the world's most famous secret agent. And the movie feels like a setup or reboot for subsequent films....which is what I thought they were doing with Casino Royale. In that film, 6 years ago, Bond was just getting his "double O". Now he's old and lost a step? And what of the secret organization he was chasing through the first two films? That's abandoned here for a different villain. The franchise now feels inconsistent. Skyfall is definitely worth seeing, though, if you like action films.

Spectre (2015) 6/10
What thee out of the four Daniel Craig James Bond movies have in common is that they feel more like Bourne movies than Bond movies. Over-gritty and dark, there's none of the fun kitsch that made Bond great on film and in print. The book Bond wasn't quite so morose. On it's own Spectre is a decent action movie with some fun sequences. As a Bond film it falls flat. Bringing back Blofeld and then making up a ridiculous link to Bond was just terrible. And as much as I like Chrispoh Walz as an actor, he brings no true menace to the character. Really, it's time to bring some of the fun back to the James Bond franchise.

Note: Unofficial James Bond films are not included in these ratings. These films include 2 early versions of Casino Royale (one made in the 50's for American TV with an American lead "Jimmy" Bond, and another a very bad British comedy made in 1967 starring David Niven) and the 1983 re-make of Thunderball, "Never Say Never Again". Never Say Never is worth mentioning because it's a real film and stars Sean Connery and Kim Basinger and was directed by Irvin Kirschner who also directed The Empire Strikes Back. It is a decent remake, although Connery was clearly too old for the role, and it showed.

But that's just the way I see it.

Saturday, July 7, 2012

Rating All The Iron Maiden Albums *Updated*

Those of you that know me and read the drivel I post here know that I love Iron Maiden. Maiden are bringing their "Maiden England" tour across the continent this summer and in that spirit, I'll rate every Iron Maiden studio album in order, with album commentary (should you care or need help sleeping). For the past dozen or so years Maiden have had a bad habit of releasing a live album and DVD after every tour so I don't bother rating them, or compilation albums. I do mention some of their live albums in commentary for the albums they toured for, but they don't get rated.

NOTE: The rankings work this way - Each song is rated out of ten. Then the album gets a rating out of ten based on the averages of all of the songs. This results in some ratings that may be surprising in that some albums that people love don't get an automatic 10/10. I can agree that an album has 4 magnificent tracks, but if the rest weighs it down the rating will reflect that. Doesn't mean the album isn't worth buying, just means that either the album wasn't strong or that the weak tracks weigh it down. If you have one track on an album that sucks, but the rest is good, the rating will suffer somewhat. Using this system one might think that a rating of 7/10 for an album is mediocre, but looking at the album as a whole, and not just focusing on the strong tracks and ignoring the weak would bring in some lower ratings for many a classic album from any band. To get to 7 means the album is likely very, very good all around.

WARNING: These are MY opinions. I know damn well that Maiden fans have strong opinions, and some of mine may seem like heresy. If you disagree, that's fine...but I still don't care. So, let's get to it.

Classic Maiden Era (1980-1985)
This is the period of time that Iron Maiden are most famous for. There are plenty of lineup changes during this time. It features Dennis Stratton on guitar for the first album, Paul Di'Anno on vocals for the first two and Clive Burr on drums for the first three. Steve Harris and Dave Murray play bass and guitar respectively on every Iron Maiden album. Adrian Smith joined in late 1980, while Bruce Dickinson joined in 1981. Their first two albums are dominated by the writing of Steve Harris, with additions from Di'Anno. The following three see a much greater influence from Adrian Smith and Bruce Dickinson, which made for a balanced and powerful songwriting trio.

Iron Maiden (1980) Producer: Will Malone 7.2/10
An album with loads of Maiden classics, it is woefully underproduced. While Phantom of the Opera is an excellent Maiden song, the performance of it on this album is clunky and suffers from bad production. The version of it on 1985's Live After Death is the best and would be rated higher. There are some great songs here, but the production takes away from the greatness. Note: Sanctuary was not on the original release.
Prowler (Harris) 8/10
Sanctuary (Harris/Di'Anno/Murray) 6/10
Remember Tomorrow (Harris/Di'Anno) 8/10
Running Free (Harris/Di'Anno) 8/10
Phantom of The Opera (Harris) 7/10
Transylvania (Harris) 7/10
Strange World (Harris) 8/10
Charlotte the Harlot (Murray) 6/10
Iron Maiden (Harris) 7/10

Killers (1981) Producer: Martin Birch 8.0/10
The addition of Martin Birch as producer immediately paid dividends to Maiden's sound. Adrian Smith's playing also adds another level of excellence to an already good band. This album has fewer well-known classics, but I like it better than the first album not just because the production is better. I like the songs better overall as well. While this was the last we would hear from Paul Di'Anno, I love his performance on this album. Note: Twilight Zone was not included on the original UK release.
The Ides of March (Harris) 8/10
Wrathchild (Harris) 9/10
Murders in the Rue Morgue (Harris) 8/10
Another Life (Harris/Di'Anno) 8/10
Genghis Khan (Harris) 7/10
Innocent Exile (Harris)  9/10
Killers (Di'Anno/Harris) 8/10
Prodigal Son (Harris) 8/10
Purgatory (Harris) 8/10
Twilight Zone (Harris/Murray) 9/10
Drifter (Harris) 6/10

The Number of the Beast (1982) Producer: Martin Birch 7.8/10
Perhaps the most well-known Maiden album, Beast had the debut of Bruce Dickinson on vocals. While maybe the most popular of their albums, it isn't my personal favourite. I love some of the tracks on this album, but there are some I've always disliked. Too bad those are the ones I keep hearing over and over again. Sorry fanboys, but I always disliked Run to the Hills and thought it was a hokey track. Note: Total Eclipse was not included on the original release.
Invaders (Harris) 8/10
Children of the Damned (Harris) 8/10
The Prisoner (Smith/Harris) 9/10
22 Acacia Avenue (Harris/Smith) 9/10
The Number of the Beast (Harris) 7/10
Run to the Hills (Harris) 6/10
Gangland (Smith/Burr) 7/10
Total Eclipse (Harris/Murray/Burr) 7/10
Hallowed Be Thy Name (Harris) 9/10

Piece of Mind (1983) Producer: Martin Birch 8.0/10
Another album full of Maiden classics, Piece of Mind is one of my favourite albums. It was on this album that we first heard Nicko McBrain on drums. One of the best drummers in the business, Piece of Mind showed so much of his skill. This album solidified Maiden as one of the most all around talented acts in show business. It was clear at this point that Iron Maiden brought an intelligence and depth that was different in rock music.
Where Eagles Dare (Harris) 9/10
Revelations (Dickinson) 9/10
Flight of Icarus (Smith/Dickinson) 10/10
Die With Your Boots On (Smith/Dickinson/Harris) 10/10
The Trooper (Harris) 9/10
Still Life (Murray/Harris) 7/10
Quest for Fire (Harris) 4/10
Sun and Steel (Dickinson/Smith) 8/10
To Tame a Land (Harris) 6/10

Powerslave (1984) Producer: Martin Birch 8.9/10
This was the first time that Maiden had released an album in which I could say that I enjoyed every track on the album. Their most solid piece of work, Powerslave, and it's Birch-produced accompanying live album Live After Death (containing classics from their first 4 albums), stands as the gold standard in the metal genre. Live After Death contains better versions of some of their first album classics, such as Phantom of the Opera and Running Free.
Aces High (Harris) 10/10
2 Minutes to Midnight (Smith/Dickinson) 10/10
Big Orra (Losfer Words) (Harris) 7/10
Flash of the Blade (Dickinson) 9/10
The Duellists (Harris) 8/10
Back in the Village (Smith/Dickinson) 8/10
Powerslave (Dickinson) 9/10
Rime of the Ancient Mariner (Harris) 10/10

Synth-Metal Era (1986-1988)
Powerslave marked the end of the classic metal era in music, not just for Iron Maiden. Sensing this, Maiden took metal in a different direction with their next two albums. Experimenting with synth guitar sounds and adding more epic songs to their albums, these two albums sound dramatically different from their predecessors. Rather than move into a more pop direction, as many of their contemporaries did with disastrous results, Maiden kept it metal, but moved the bar forward.

Somewhere in Time (1986) Producer: Martin Birch 9.0/10
Somewhere in Time is my favourite Maiden album, and in my top 5 of all-time. I love the sound on this album. I love the songwriting on this album. Maiden achieved a depth here that they did not match before or again. Dickinson has stated that he wasn't happy with this album, and there is no songwriting from him here, but I politely disagree. An amazing work of heavy metal and with the best album cover of all-time.
Caught Somewhere in Time (Harris) 8/10
Wasted Years (Smith) 9/10
Sea of Madness (Smith) 10/10
Heaven Can Wait (Harris) 8/10
The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner (Harris) 10/10
Stranger in a Strange Land (Smith) 9/10
Deja-Vu (Murray/Harris) 9/10
Alexander the Great (Harris) 9/10

Seventh Son of a Seventh Son Producer: Martin Birch (1988) 7.6/10
Maiden's concept album about a fantasy character with the powers of clairvoyance and healing, Seventh Son is the favourite album of many die-hard Maiden fans I know. Like Somewhere in Time, I love the sound on this album. The songs, in my view, aren't as strong. Still, it is a fantastic album and the last to feature Adrian Smith for a dozen years. Seventh Son represents the end of Maiden's fantastically successful 80's run.
Moonchild (Smith/Dickinson) 9/10
Infinite Dreams (Harris) 9/10
Can I Play With Madness (Smith/Dickinson/Harris) 7/10
The Evil That Men Do (Smith/Dickinson/Harris) 8/10
Seventh Son of a Seventh Son (Harris) 7/10
The Prophecy (Murray/Harris) 7/10
The Clairvoyant (Harris) 7/10
Only the Good Die Young (Harris/Dickinson) 7/10

Metal Roots Era (1990-1993)
Prior to recording their follow up to Seventh Son guitarist Adrian Smith left Iron Maiden, leaving a void both in terms of playing and writing. Also during this time Bruce Dickinson released his first solo album, Tattooed Millionaire. The guitarist on that album was Janick Gers, who stepped in to Iron Maiden thereafter. Gers would prove to be a reliable songwriter for Maiden in the following years, but has a playing style that some have described as sloppy. Still, Maiden could have done worse than Gers since he helped pen some good Maiden tracks. During this time Iron Maiden made an obvious effort to come up with a more raw, classic metal sound.

No Prayer For The Dying (1990) Producer: Martin Birch 5.9/10
A return to a more raw sound and the addition of Janick Gers are the stories of this album. The songwriting is rather poor overall and the the production is undercooked. This is one of Maiden's weakest efforts, with some laughably bad tracks. Oddly, two of the three standout tracks on this album come from Dave Murray, who doesn't write many songs for Maiden. I know a few Maiden fans who don't like Holy Smoke, but I quite frankly always loved that track. So sue me.
Tailgunner (Harris/Dickinson) 6/10
Holy Smoke (Harris Dickinson) 9/10
No Prayer for the Dying (Harris) 6/10
Public Enema Number One (Murray Dickinson) 7/10
Fates Warning (Murray/Harris) 7/10
The Assassin (Harris) 4/10
Run Silent, Run Deep (Harris/Dickinson) 6/10
Hooks in You (Dickinson/Smith) 4/10
Bring Your Daughter....To The Slaughter (Dickinson) 6/10
Mother Russia (Harris) 4/10

Fear of the Dark (1992) Producer: Martin Birch and Steve Harris 6.3/10
With Fear of the Dark Iron Maiden won back some of the goodwill that they lost with No Prayer. Overall a much stronger effort that carries some classic Maiden tracks. Gers contributes several writing credits on this album, to mostly good effect. The production quality here is much better than No Prayer as well. A better album, if a bit inconsistent. It was really too bad that Dickinson would leave Iron Maiden after this album to pursue his solo career more fully. Dickinson really did some good solo stuff after this too, working with Roy Z and reuniting with Adrian Smith for part of his rather good catalogue.
Be Quick or Be Dead (Dickinson/Gers) 8/10
From Here to Eternity (Harris) 4/10
Afraid to Shoot Strangers (Harris) 8/10
Fear is the Key (Dickinson/Gers) 7/10
Childhood's End (Harris) 7/10
Wasting Love (Dickinson/Gers) 5/10
The Fugitive (Harris) 5/10
Chains of Misery (Dickinson/Murray) 7/10
The Apparition (Harris/Gers) 5/10
Judas Be My Guide (Dickinson/Murray) 7/10
Weekend Warrior (Harris/Gers) 5/10
Fear of the Dark (Harris) 8/10

Blayze Bayley Era (1995-1998)
Iron Maiden's new singer was Blaze Bailey. I found this to be a bizarre choice because, in my view, Bayley had neither the range nor the ability to perform Maiden's catalogue. Clearly they didn't want a Dickinson knock-off (just as Dickinson was quite different from Di'Anno), but time would show that Bayley was clearly the wrong guy for the job. His penchant for singing off-key is quite unbelievable. So many of these tracks end up with ratings of 5/10 because they were written better than that but were brought down to that level by production and performance.

The X Factor (1995) Producer: Steve Harris and Nigel Green 5.5/10
This album drives me nuts for a couple of reasons. One is that the songwriting is rather strong, with some great tracks. The second reason is that those tracks are horribly spoiled by terrible vocal performances and production without any sort of energy. The best track, Sign of the Cross, suffers badly from this. A much better version is on the 2001 live album Rock in Rio with Dickinson on vocals. It is there that you see what could have been. It's sad. This album also started Steve Harris' annoying habit of attaching long, boring intros to his songs...something he's never been broken of.
The Sign of the Cross 7/10
Lord of the Flies (Harris/Gers) 7/10
Man on the Edge (Bayley/Gers) 7/10
Fortunes of War (Harris) 6/10
Look for the Truth (Bayley/Gers/Harris) 5/10
The Aftermath (Harris/Bayley/Gers) 4/10
Judgement of Heaven (Harris) 5/10
Blood on the World's Hands (Harris) 5/10
The Edge of Darkness (Harris/Bayley/Gers) 5/10
2 a.m. (Bayley/Gers/Harris) 5/10
The Unbeliever (Harris/Gers) 5/10

Virtual XI (1998) Producer: Steve Harris and Nigel Green 5.4/10
The second, and last, Blazy Bayley album, this one has weaker songwriting than X-Factor and just as bad vocal performances. Again, there are a couple of tracks that the band have performed live with Dickinson and Smith (The Clansman on Rock in Rio is excellent) that sound much better and show what could have been. There are some synth additions on this album that sound cool, though. I like the feel of this album better than the dark and brooding X-Factor, but I just can't get past the Bayley vocals, which ruin everything.
Futureal (Harris/Bayley) 7/10
The Angel and the Gambler (Harris) 6/10
Lightning Strikes Twice (Murray/Harris) 5/10
The Clansman (Harris) 7/10
When Two Worlds Collide (Murray/Bayley/Harris) 5/10
The Educated Fool (Harris) 5/10
Don't Look to the Eyes of a Stranger (Harris) 4/10
Como Estais Amigos (Gers/Bayley) 4/10

Classic Reunion Era (1999-2015+)
In 1999 Iron Maiden dismissed vocalist Blayze Bayley and reunited with Bruce Dickinson and Adrian Smith. Smith had been playing in Dickinson's solo band along with the excellent Roy Z. At this point Maiden became a 3 guitar act with Murray, Gers and Smith. This has proven to be an excellent combo, with Maiden releasing a lot of good material since 2000. Not all of it is stellar, but a lot of it is really good. The addition of Adrian Smith's songwriting and playing abilities really helped Iron Maiden, as Steve Harris was (and still is) mired in an obsession with epic length tracks with long, boring intros. This has left Smith, Gers, Murray and Dickinson the task of writing the rockers for Maiden, and they've done a good job of it since 2000. Murray really shows hits ability on Brave New World. Contrastic this era to the previous 10 years really shows the void that was left when Adrian Smith left Iron Maiden. The man is simply an amazingly talented songwriter and musician.

Brave New World (2000) Producer: Kevin Shirley and Steve Harris 7.6/10
By 2000 it had been a dozen years since Iron Maiden had released an album that could truly be called excellent. That streak ended with Brave New World. So much about this album is excellent, from the album cover on down. Great songwriting, great sound, great performances. A return to form for Iron Maiden that ranks with their 80's period.
The Wicker Man (Smith/Harris/Dickinson) 9/10
Ghost of the Navigator (Gers/Dickinson/Harris) 8/10
Brave New World  (Murray/Harris/Dickinson) 8/10
Blood Brothers (Harris) 9/10
The Mercenary (Gers/Harris) 8/10
Dream of Mirrors (Gers/Harris) 5/10
The Fallen Angel (Smith/Harris) 8/10
The Nomad (Murray/Harris) 8/10
Out of the Silent Planet (Gers/Dickinson/Harris) 5/10
The Thin Line Between Love & Hate (Murray/Harris) 8/10

Dance of Death (2003) Producer: Kevin Shirley and Steve Harris 5.4/10
Aside from the awful album cover, most Maiden fans I know really like this album. I, however, do not. There are a couple of standout tracks for me, but overall I found the songwriting to be sub par. The title track is like a Spinal Tap song, Rainmaker is catchy but repetitive, with no second verse, and the opening track is really hokey and bad. There are just a lot of bad tracks here. A letdown album after the great Brave New World. Not much else to say.
Wildest Dreams (Smith/Harris) 4/10
Rainmaker (Murray/Harris/Dickinson) 6/10
No More Lies (Harris) 6/10
Montsegur (Gers/Harris/Dickinson) 8/10
Dance of Death (Gers/Harris) 4/10
Gates of Tomorrow (Gers/Harris/Dickinson) 4/10
New Frontier (McBrain/Smith/Dickinson) 4/10
Paschendale (Smith/Harris) 8/10
Face in the Sand (Smith/Harris/Dickinson) 7/10
Age of Innocence (Murray/Harris) 4/10
Journeyman (Smith/Harris/Dickinson) 4/10

A Matter of Life and Death (2006) Producer: Kevin Shirley and Steve Harris 6.4/10
After Dance of Death I could have been forgiven for thinking that Brave New World was an anomaly and that Maiden really had simply run out of steam and couldn't do it anymore. I was happy to be mostly wrong about that. A Matter of Life and Death has enough solid material to sustain it, but enough mediocre material to be somewhat of a disappointment. Still, there are tracks on this album that I keep coming back to. Steve Harris waters down some wonderful work here with his typical post-1995 boring intros. This album would have been miles better without them weighing down tracks like Benjamin Breeg and The Legacy.
Different World (Smith/Harris) 5/10
These Colours Don't Run (Smith/Harris/Dickinson) 7/10
Brighter Than A Thousand Suns (Smith/Harris/Dickinson) 6/10
The Pilgrim (Gers/Harris) 8/10
The Longest Day (Smith/Harris/Dickinson) 8/10
Out of the Shadows (Dickinson/Harris) 5/10
The Reincarnation of Benjamin Breeg (Murray/Harris) 6/10
For the Greater Good of God (Harris) 7/10
Lord of Light (Smith/Harris/Dickionson) 6/10
The Legacy (Gers/Harris) 6/10

The Final Frontier (2010) Producer: Kevin Shirley and Steve Harris 6.8/10
Steve Harris continues his determination to make songs less good by including long, boring intros. The fact that you can't skip over Satellite 15 to get to the rocking title track really pisses me off. In fact, I now just rely on their great live version of the title track from 2012's decent live album El Vivo. El Dorado is a half baked track, and the final two songs needed to have their boring intros chopped to make them into much better tracks. Still, again there are songs I just keep coming back to, like Mother of Mercy,The Alchemist, Isle of Avalon and the magnificent Starblind. Overall, a good record.
Satellite 15...The Final Frontier (Smith/Harris) 7/10
El Dorado (Smith/Harris/Dickinson) 6/10
Mother of Mercy (Smith Harris)  7/10
Coming Home (Smith/Harris/Dickinson) 5/10
The Alchemist (Gers/Harris/Dickinson) 8/10
Isle of Avalon (Smith/Harris) 8/10
Starblind (Smith/Harris/Dickinson) 10/10
The Talisman (Gers/Harris) 6/10
The Man Who Would Be King (Murray/Harris) 6/10
When the Wild Wind Blows (Harris) 5/10

The Book of Souls (2015) Producer: Kevin Shirley and Steve Harris 6.3/10 (Disc 1 7.2/10; Disc 2 5.2/10)
Iron Maiden's first double album contains some great moments, but is marred by some sketchy vocal performances from Dickinson and a lot of self-indulgent bloat. On some tracks, like Speed of Light, it sounds like Dickinson did one take and it wasn't even on time. The album has a tonne of great riffs and passages. But every single song of the album could have been shortened to it's benefit. The Red and the Black starts out great and then just bores the hell out of you with endless interludes. Empire of the Clouds is an Andrew Lloyd Weber-type production that is positively excruciating to sit through. Overall, however, there are enough good moments on Book of Souls to recommend. But glory days are long gone. Note: Had the album been simply the first half it would have a rating of 7.2, ranking it among their better albums. But disc 2 is so weak that it drags then whole project down.
Disc 1
If Eternity Should Fail (Dickinson) 7/10
Speed of Light (Smith/Dickinson) 7/10
The Great Unknown (Smith/Harris) 8/10
The Red and the Black (Harris) 6/10
When the River Runs Deep (Smith/Harris) 8/10
The Book of Souls (Gers/Harris) 7/10
Disc 2
Death or Glory (Smith/Dickinson) 5/10
Shadows of the Valley (Gers/Harris) 5/10
Tears of a Clown (Smith/Harris) 7/10
The Man of Sorrows (Murray/Harris) 5/10
Empire of the Clouds (Dickinson) 4/10

So there it is. All of Iron Maiden's studio albums rated, song by song. My rankings, incidentally, put Somewhere in Time at #1 and Virtual XI and Dance of Death tied for last place.

The rankings, in order, are:
Somewhere in Time 9.0
Powerslave 8.9
Piece of Mind/Killers (tie) 8.0
The Number of the Beast 7.8
Seventh Son of a Seventh Son/Brave New World (tie) 7.6
Iron Maiden 7.2
The Final Frontier 6.8
A Matter of Life and Death 6.4
Fear of the Dark 6.3
The Book of Souls 6.3
No Prayer for the Dying 5.9
The X-Factor 5.5
Virtual XI/Dance of Death (tie) 5.4

Maiden have released a lengthy list of live albums, most of which I simply cannot recommend. 1993's Real Live/Dead One and Live at Donnington are both appalling in their production. Absolutely un-listenable. 1985's Live After Death, on the other hand, is one of the best live albums you'll ever hear. 2001's Rock in Rio is a good live album as well. The Death on the Road album has a list of tracks I dislike on it, but El Vivo! is not bad at all. The Beast Over Hammersmith live album is difficult to get a hold of, but is rather good, as well.

Final Commentary: 
Looking at Iron Maiden's catalogue it is easy to see how much you can create and do when you're young and fit. Between 1980 and 1988 Iron Maiden were doing an album and world tour almost every year. They released albums in 1980, 81, 82, 83, 84, 86, and 88. All of them are great albums. That is a monumental amount of material in a short span of time. The materal they released in the next ten years was significantly less strong. This was in part due to the departure of Adrian Smith in 1989 and the departure of Dickinson in 1996. You have to think, however, that Maiden had lost some of that youthful energy and creativity. Instead of taking a break (something they've learned to do in the last 12 years) to recharge, they just kept the train rolling. The material suffered.

Since the reunion in 1999 Iron Maiden have been a much better band, but only once have they reached the heights of their 80's material. I think that some of this is due to the fact that Steve Harris is determined to produce and direct Iron Maiden, whereas in the 80's he had a producer who would stand up to him and the rest of the band and say "no, that's not good enough!". Again, the material has suffered. Since 2000 they have recorded 5 studio albums with only one topping the magic 7/10 number. The Final Frontier comes very close, but just misses. I rarely find myself putting in a post-80's Maiden album and listening to it as an album anymore. I simply pick the tracks I want and make a playlist. There are plenty of wonderful tracks, just not plenty of wonderful albums. Still, their good tracks on weak albums are miles better than most other metal out there, and that's what keeps people coming back to Iron Maiden.

But that's just the way I see it.